Re: Big magnetic fields
- From: "Logan Kearsley" <chrono.surfer@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 03:02:54 GMT
"Paul F. Dietz" <dietz@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:scOdnfIXIP1rkkzfRVn-jw@xxxxxxxxxx
> Logan Kearsley wrote:
>
> > In that case, while the plasma won't compress anymore on its own,
there's
> > nothing to prevent you from adding more energy to compress it further,
> > possibly by means of a magnetohydrodynamic engine.
>
> The problem here is that you have to do work on the plasma.
> Lots of work. And it still doesn't get you close to high
> density.
>
> And think about what you're proposing: dump lots of energy
> into the plasma, *just so you can radiate it away*. If the
What does that matter, as long as the expenditure is less than the energy
gained via fusion, or antimatter annihilation, or whatever other process one
happens to be using? Anyway, I wouldn't plan to just radiate it away- I
would plan to keep as much of it as possible in the plasma (either by simply
not removing it at all, or by extracting some of the heat with a heat engine
and using that to power a magnetohydrodynamic engine to linearly accelerate
the exhaust), so as to maximize the exhaust velocity.
> vehicle is traveling at relativistic speeds, the energy will
> be far higher than the fusion energy you might get out of
> the plasma. Hell, at moderately relativistic speeds the
> energy is greater than the rest energy of the ions once
> they've been brought to rest and cooled.
Aha! That's I was looking for. So, the physical limit one hits is a point at
which the energy required to compress the plasma is greater than the energy
that can be extracted by fusion. That makes sense.
Now, I just have to wonder if there's a way to engineer around that....
> No, if you want to get rid of the entropy, you need to
> radiate it when the plasma is still cool. This means
> you need to radiate before it has been highly compressed.
> (I don't care what mechanism does the compression; none
> of those mechanisms can avoid the 2nd law.)
Now, I still don't see why one would want to cool it at all, unless the
energy can be added back in again, as one wants the highest exhaust velocity
possible. But assuming that one does need to cool the plasma, and building a
long enough spacecraft is infeasible, how about this:
Rather than feeding directly into the compressor/reactor, the ramscoop feeds
into a set of reverse cyclotrons- the ions and free electrons are put on
circular track in powerful magnetic fields, such that they dump their energy
into the fields and possibly could be used to generate electrical power. The
just-injected particles would be moving along the outer edges of the tracks,
and eventually would be collected at the inner edges once they've lost
enough energy, after which they can be sent on to the compressor/reactor.
-l.
------------------------------------
My inbox is a sacred shrine, none shall enter that are not worthy.
.
- References:
- Re: Big magnetic fields
- From: Edward Cherlin
- Re: Big magnetic fields
- From: David Mitchell
- Re: Big magnetic fields
- From: Paul F. Dietz
- Re: Big magnetic fields
- From: Logan Kearsley
- Re: Big magnetic fields
- From: Paul F. Dietz
- Re: Big magnetic fields
- From: Logan Kearsley
- Re: Big magnetic fields
- From: Paul F. Dietz
- Re: Big magnetic fields
- From: Logan Kearsley
- Re: Big magnetic fields
- From: Logan Kearsley
- Re: Big magnetic fields
- From: Paul F. Dietz
- Re: Big magnetic fields
- From: Logan Kearsley
- Re: Big magnetic fields
- From: Paul F. Dietz
- Re: Big magnetic fields
- From: Logan Kearsley
- Re: Big magnetic fields
- From: Paul F. Dietz
- Re: Big magnetic fields
- From: Logan Kearsley
- Re: Big magnetic fields
- From: Paul F. Dietz
- Re: Big magnetic fields
- Prev by Date: Re: Time Machines
- Next by Date: Re: Close approaches by stars (was Re: Exotic breathable atmospheres...
- Previous by thread: Re: Big magnetic fields
- Next by thread: Re: Big magnetic fields
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|