Re: Proton-Proton Fusion- the easy way
- From: "Logan Kearsley" <chrono.surfer@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 18:09:43 GMT
"Luke Campbell" <lwcamp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1121188823.985438.302280@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > If the chamber that the fusion reaction is going on in is a high grade
> > mirror, would this increase insulation? I assume that most of the heat
> > lost from the reactor is due to radiated heat from the plasma ? Not
> > sure if this is really related to this thread though.
>
> The heat is lost via radiation, but the plasma is so hot this radiation
> is in the soft x-ray aprt of the spectrum. Mirrors made from materials
> held together by chemical bonds (like metals, etc) do not do a very
> good job reflecting x-rays at anything other than grazing incidence.
The solution, then, would seem to be to use something that absorbs x-rays
very well, such that at least half of the energy gets re-radiated back into
the reactor.
-l.
------------------------------------
My inbox is a sacred shrine, none shall enter that are not worthy.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Proton-Proton Fusion- the easy way
- From: Luke Campbell
- Re: Proton-Proton Fusion- the easy way
- References:
- Proton-Proton Fusion- the easy way
- From: Logan Kearsley
- Re: Proton-Proton Fusion- the easy way
- From: Logan Kearsley
- Re: Proton-Proton Fusion- the easy way
- From: raphfrk
- Re: Proton-Proton Fusion- the easy way
- From: Luke Campbell
- Proton-Proton Fusion- the easy way
- Prev by Date: Re: Proton-Proton Fusion- the easy way
- Next by Date: Re: Effects of near-c vessels on surroundings...
- Previous by thread: Re: Proton-Proton Fusion- the easy way
- Next by thread: Re: Proton-Proton Fusion- the easy way
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading