Re: Hugo results
- From: prd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Paul Dormer)
- Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 11:03 +0100 (BST)
In article <op.uyt3ydag5qv6o3@toshiba-laptop>, mkeesan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(Morris Keesan) wrote:
And this means that in two categories you've expressed the opinion
that something you've seen is better than something you haven't
seen, and more deserving of an award. And by expressing that
opinion in the form of a vote, you're causing your opinion to have
equal weight with the opinions of voters who have read or viewed
all of the nominees.
My view is that by not ranking those items I've not read, I'm expressing
no opinions about them whatsoever.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Hugo results
- From: Morris Keesan
- Re: Hugo results
- From: Evelyn Leeper
- Re: Hugo results
- References:
- Re: Hugo results
- From: Morris Keesan
- Re: Hugo results
- Prev by Date: Re: Worldcon news
- Next by Date: Re: 109 Inches Of Rain in 48 Hours?
- Previous by thread: Re: Hugo results
- Next by thread: Re: Hugo results
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading
