Re: "Unholy love-child of bicycle and monorail"
- From: "Keith F. Lynch" <kfl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 25 Jul 2009 13:44:49 -0400
cryptoguy <treifamily@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Keith F. Lynch" <kfl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
cryptoguy <treifamily@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
No, more people need to commute than can engage in exercise.
Biking at a 12 miles per hour -- the Segway's maximum speed --
barely counts as exercise. I'd be willing to bet there are far
more people who don't need to commute than there are who are too
weak or lame to ride a bike at 12 mph.
Which is relevant how? The existence of mobility impaired non-
commuters says nothing about what mobility impaired commuters
would do.
I was responding to your claim that "more people need to commute than
can engage in exercise."
The device the OP describes is much less useful than a bicycle,
since it requires expensive tracks, and there seems no way to change
track or pass slow or stopped pods.
That's so obvious that I'm assuming there's a way to change track. If
not to get around slower riders, then certainly to head to different
destinations.
--
Keith F. Lynch - http://keithlynch.net/
Please see http://keithlynch.net/email.html before emailing me.
.
- References:
- "Unholy love-child of bicycle and monorail"
- From: GeekGirl
- Re: "Unholy love-child of bicycle and monorail"
- From: cryptoguy
- Re: "Unholy love-child of bicycle and monorail"
- From: Keith F. Lynch
- Re: "Unholy love-child of bicycle and monorail"
- From: cryptoguy
- "Unholy love-child of bicycle and monorail"
- Prev by Date: Re: Safety features
- Next by Date: Re: Safety features
- Previous by thread: Re: "Unholy love-child of bicycle and monorail"
- Next by thread: Re: "Unholy love-child of bicycle and monorail"
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|