Re: digital slr
- From: "Keith F. Lynch" <kfl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 20 Feb 2009 20:14:41 -0500
David Friedman <ddfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I do handheld shots down to about an eighth of a second with
reasonable success. I would certainly prefer a camera that let me
do 1/30th shots in poor museum conditions without much noise in the
image, but I don't think the advantage would be overwhelming.
If it's possible to autofocus, it ought to be possible to
autostabilize, allowing handheld shots of a stationary subject
of any length.
--
Keith F. Lynch - http://keithlynch.net/
Please see http://keithlynch.net/email.html before emailing me.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: digital slr
- From: David Friedman
- Re: digital slr
- References:
- Re: digital slr
- From: rkshullat
- Re: digital slr
- From: David Friedman
- Re: digital slr
- From: rkshullat
- Re: digital slr
- From: David Friedman
- Re: digital slr
- Prev by Date: Re: digital slr
- Next by Date: Re: digital slr
- Previous by thread: Re: digital slr
- Next by thread: Re: digital slr
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|