Re: More future just arrived.
- From: "Karl Johanson" <karljohanson@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 20:09:07 GMT
"Jette" <bosslady@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
Karl Johanson wrote:
"Keith F. Lynch" <kfl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
Martha Adams <mhada@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
This morning's Public Radio included a piece about a news programI've never understood the point of "talking heads," human or
named "Alex." Alex is a complete computer TV newscaster whose
speech is a little off yet but the basics are all there.
artificial. TV news is better than print news in only one way: It
can show what events *look* like, rather than just describing them.
Some news events, such as 9/11, are intensely visual. Most,
however,
aren't. And whether they are or aren't, what's the point in
watching
someone reading the news, when you can simply read it yourself?
Among the many traits of humans is that we're social creatures. Some
people prefer to see news from people on a screen, rather than read
it themselves, as it feels more like social interaction. Some who are
alone but don't like being alone, feel less alone if there's a news
show on. As well, if the news reader strikes the viewer as 'an
authority figure', they may be more likely to watch them, thinking
the news from them has more truthiness. Also, a great deal of news is
heavily editorialized. I realize that this is true of text news as
well as visual news, but many like to be told how to interpret the
news, or to at least see how others are interpreting it, and visual
news includes vocal stress, gestoral and expression clues as to how
the broadcaster is reacting to the news..
It's also easier to listen to tv news, instead of reading it yourself,
while doing other things (such as reading email). You may say that
for this radio news would be enough - but with tv news, you can look
up from what you're doing to watch the footage of something that
attracts your attention.
Well said. Also, I sometimes find it easier to write or do art if I have
distractions.
Karl Johanson
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: More future just arrived.
- From: Keith F. Lynch
- Re: More future just arrived.
- References:
- More future just arrived.
- From: Martha Adams
- Re: More future just arrived.
- From: Keith F. Lynch
- Re: More future just arrived.
- From: Karl Johanson
- Re: More future just arrived.
- From: Jette
- More future just arrived.
- Prev by Date: Re: Ominous spam
- Next by Date: Re: More future just arrived.
- Previous by thread: Re: More future just arrived.
- Next by thread: Re: More future just arrived.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|