Re: More future just arrived.
- From: Jette <bosslady@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 18:17:44 GMT
Karl Johanson wrote:
"Keith F. Lynch" <kfl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wroteMartha Adams <mhada@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:This morning's Public Radio included a piece about a news programI've never understood the point of "talking heads," human or
named "Alex." Alex is a complete computer TV newscaster whose
speech is a little off yet but the basics are all there.
artificial. TV news is better than print news in only one way: It
can show what events *look* like, rather than just describing them.
Some news events, such as 9/11, are intensely visual. Most, however,
aren't. And whether they are or aren't, what's the point in watching
someone reading the news, when you can simply read it yourself?
Among the many traits of humans is that we're social creatures. Some people prefer to see news from people on a screen, rather than read it themselves, as it feels more like social interaction. Some who are alone but don't like being alone, feel less alone if there's a news show on. As well, if the news reader strikes the viewer as 'an authority figure', they may be more likely to watch them, thinking the news from them has more truthiness. Also, a great deal of news is heavily editorialized. I realize that this is true of text news as well as visual news, but many like to be told how to interpret the news, or to at least see how others are interpreting it, and visual news includes vocal stress, gestoral and expression clues as to how the broadcaster is reacting to the news..
It's also easier to listen to tv news, instead of reading it yourself, while doing other things (such as reading email). You may say that for this radio news would be enough - but with tv news, you can look up from what you're doing to watch the footage of something that attracts your attention.
--
Jette Goldie
jette@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.jette.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/
http://wolfette.livejournal.com/
("reply to" is spamblocked - use the email addy in sig)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: More future just arrived.
- From: Nate Edel
- Re: More future just arrived.
- From: Karl Johanson
- Re: More future just arrived.
- References:
- More future just arrived.
- From: Martha Adams
- Re: More future just arrived.
- From: Keith F. Lynch
- Re: More future just arrived.
- From: Karl Johanson
- More future just arrived.
- Prev by Date: Re: More future just arrived.
- Next by Date: Re: Ominous spam
- Previous by thread: Re: More future just arrived.
- Next by thread: Re: More future just arrived.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|