Re: Answer the question, already. What is your version of the "concept of choice"? (was Re: When even a Republican can see it....)

<dwight.thieme@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
On Jul 7, 8:15 pm, David Friedman <d...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In article <muGdnbNnq5GklQ3bnZ2dnUVZ8vydn...@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Dave O'Neill" <dav...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

"David Friedman" <d...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message


Have you stopped beating you wife yet David?


You haven't? So when did you start?

I didn't.

Then why did you say you stopped? See?

I didn't say I stopped. As you can easily see by reading what I

Not at all, I can clearly say that I asked a plain question "Have you
stopped beating your wife..." and you said, "No."

Indeed you can. You can even say that I said I stopped. But you would be
lying since, as you can see from what is quoted above, I didn't say I

David, you're lying, flat out. That's one of the reasons so many
people have contempt for you.

Oh, I'll even post one so that Dave can have objective evidence that
he's far from alone:

<snip MKK stuff>

Yes, I saw parts of that at the time.

I have a reasonable amount of time, it being summer. But the main reason
is that I am very bad at dropping an argument when it isn't over, when
the other party is saying things that seem to me clearly and
demonstrably wrong--as opposed to the point at which it is clear to each
party what the other's views are and why he holds them and on what
factual or theoretical questions they differ.

This is, of course, another lie. When I pointed out how egregiously
wrong you were on a simple point of mathematics, you neither continued
nor admitted you were wrong.

And thus, I submit, the biggest problem people have with
libertarianism is . . . libertarians. While David seems to be an
extreme case, there are others more extreme (think JAD) and others
less. But all seem to share a certain, shall we say, pathology.

Well I have a lot of sympathy towards a lot of liberatarian views, of
course, as an intelligent being I can over-ride my natural selfish instincts
and think about what is good for other people too.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: [OT] USAA
    ... the ultra-rich created the tea party the way the Corporations ... as whiny in the extreme. ... he smells bad and he farts in the negotiation room and I hate him I hate him ... "I think a good chunk of the Republican caucus is either stupid, crazy, ignorant or craven cowards, who are desperately afraid of the tea party people, and rightly so." ...
  • Re: Bill Maher on "The Party of Stinkin" (NBC)
    ... I will continue to speak my mind ... party to fight dirty and stick with it till - as you say - its time to ... Well, I agree, as I've already stated how I loathe the extreme right, ... both the conservatives and liberals have created ...
  • Re: CNN fact checks SNL on obama
    ... the libertarianism of Noam ... than the Green Party or any of the other smaller parties. ... definition - is a system where the state controls industry. ...
  • Re: Why John Ringo Threatens Science Fictions Future
    ... > today than they were to Marxists back when I was one. ... Libertarians get fire from three sides: the left for being too fiscally ... liberal, and their own party. ... private distaste for their own party's extreme wing, ...
  • Re: Bushs Resignation Speech, ping McDave. (Dont worry, Dave, its not all accusations)
    ... Well, thank you for this honesty, Dave, but unless you're talking ... about yourself and your fellow party members, let me restate - for the ... would have real consequences. ... the party of election theft - to hand you not only ...