Re: >^..^< The cats on 28 April 2007
- From: Harry Andruschak <adoptsoldcats@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 29 Apr 2007 23:14:12 -0700
On Apr 29, 8:24�pm, David Harmon <sou...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
).
Harry's clarification is perfectly in order here, even if not in the
courtroom.
Harry, does that mean that everybody who would identify themselves as
Catholic are governed by that kind of vow? I never knew that.
Maybe not, depending on how you interpret the Affirmation of Faith.
But my vows are part of my penitent group
Are you assigned to the court on Maple?
The one in Torrance? Yes.
.
- References:
- >^..^< The cats on 28 April 2007
- From: Harry Andruschak
- Re: >^..^< The cats on 28 April 2007
- From: Harry Andruschak
- Re: >^..^< The cats on 28 April 2007
- From: Keith F. Lynch
- Re: >^..^< The cats on 28 April 2007
- From: Harry Andruschak
- Re: >^..^< The cats on 28 April 2007
- From: Keith F. Lynch
- Re: >^..^< The cats on 28 April 2007
- From: David Harmon
- >^..^< The cats on 28 April 2007
- Prev by Date: Re: ~50 million dead since Chernobyl
- Next by Date: Re: Aphorisms
- Previous by thread: Re: >^..^< The cats on 28 April 2007
- Next by thread: Re: >^..^< The cats on 28 April 2007
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
