Re: Non-exploding NiMH batteries
- From: dbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ("David G. Bell")
- Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 06:45:01 +0100 (BST)
On Thursday, in article
<3IWdndY4mqTe9TnZnZ2dnUVZ_sadnZ2d@xxxxxxx> dietz@xxxxxxx
"Paul F. Dietz" wrote:
Paul Ciszek wrote:
Buy an old Stanley Steamer and refurbish it; you'll get much better
performance, and it's a flex-fuel vehicle.
The point of this was a vehicle that could be electrically
recharged and didn't need to burn any liquid fuel.
A Stanley has the wrong sort of boiler, but "fireless" boilers were
built and used.
--
David G. Bell -- SF Fan, Filker, and Punslinger.
"I am Number Two," said Penfold. "You are Number Six."
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Non-exploding NiMH batteries
- From: Wilson Heydt
- Re: Non-exploding NiMH batteries
- From: Paul F. Dietz
- Re: Non-exploding NiMH batteries
- References:
- Non-exploding NiMH batteries
- From: Paul Ciszek
- Re: Non-exploding NiMH batteries
- From: Robert Sneddon
- Re: Non-exploding NiMH batteries
- From: Paul F. Dietz
- Re: Non-exploding NiMH batteries
- From: mike weber
- Re: Non-exploding NiMH batteries
- From: Paul Ciszek
- Re: Non-exploding NiMH batteries
- From: Paul F. Dietz
- Non-exploding NiMH batteries
- Prev by Date: Re: National Anthems
- Next by Date: Re: Question: space elevator
- Previous by thread: Re: Non-exploding NiMH batteries
- Next by thread: Re: Non-exploding NiMH batteries
- Index(es):