Re: Monorail. Monorail! Monoraaaail!



In article <87mzgr2s33.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
David Dyer-Bennet <dd-b@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

whheydt@xxxxxxxxxxx (Wilson Heydt) writes:

In article <dt0rnn$e9m$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Keith F. Lynch <kfl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

....

Indeed, Metro, over its 30 year history, during which it had
transported nearly a million people per day, has cost almost as
much as one highway bridge (http://www.wilsonbridge.com/) and
one road intersection (http://www.springfieldinterchange.com/).

Is that really "nearly amillion people aday" or is it really "nearly
a million *trips* a day"? Transit systems are very fond of counting
individual trips as if they were all distinct individuals. On a
commute system, the truth is about half of what is claimed.

Or, if they manage to count people who change trains on a single trip
twice (or go between train and bus) it can easily be 4 or 6 times.

It occurs to me that the million people a day figure is inconsistent
with my earlier calculations on Metro's total expenditure. According to
the Metro web page, revenue from fares pay for 55% of operating costs,
narrowly defined to not include replacemenet of worn out equipment.
According to the same page, the operating defit for next year is
expected to be $60 million. I put those numbers together to estimate
operating costs of a little over a hundred million dollars.

But if they are selling a million trips a day--the more conservative
reading of Keith's claim--at average price of $1.50 a trip (the page
says the minimum fare is $1.35, maximum $3.90, so that's a very
conservative estimate) that would be a fare income of about $500
million/year, implying an operating budget of about $900 million.

For those who haven't read the Metro web page, it's clear that its
purpose isn't to provide accurate information but to persuade the reader
that Metro needs to be given more money. So perhaps it isn't surprising
that they don't give clear information about the actual finances.

I did find the ridership figure, however, The combined ridership (rail
and bus) is 336 million trips (not people)/year.

--
www.daviddfriedman.com
daviddfriedman.blogspot.com/
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: UNITE! Info #221en: 1/2 Gold was right: Plenty of oil
    ... Preparing a site from which to drill, in a harsh, sensitive environment. ... The drilling itself was only a small part of the total cost. ... As to the costs of oil production, there are a whole range of factors to ... those operating costs, the field is played out economically and has to be ...
    (sci.energy)
  • Re: An Empirical Nonlinear Filter
    ... one could say that failure to use capacity could cause a problem in how ... Since there seems to be such interest in how operating costs are handled, ... remains the question of how to compensate for investment. ...
    (comp.dsp)
  • Re: What a Scam!
    ... They manufactures have high administration and operations costs. ... If you look at the total operating costs for a typical ... I was aware that manufacturers charged high prices for replacement parts, ...
    (sci.electronics.repair)
  • Re: London tram system postponed because...?
    ... >> Prescott's earlier tram schemes have been scaled back for this reason. ... but the fares do not cover operating costs enough to pay back the ... wonder why such infrastructure costs so much in the first place. ... smart men solve problems, wise men avoid them. ...
    (uk.politics.misc)
  • Re: An AFL Conspiracy
    ... Still, I'm curious how he sent $235 to Free Arts Minnesota, when ... informed sources tell me that he collected $4,500. ... costs (and trips to DisneyWorld) is nasty. ...
    (alt.fan.letterman)