Re: This may actually be a first
- From: jdnicoll@xxxxxxxxx (James Nicoll)
- Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 14:50:54 +0000 (UTC)
In article <0o0ht1loig3evg6d8ce881f63crc17so9a@xxxxxxx>,
Daniel R. Reitman <dreitman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 16:03:37 +0000 (UTC), jdnicoll@xxxxxxxxx (James
>Nicoll) wrote:
>
>>. . . .
>
>>Party Seats Politics
>>Liberals 103 Natural Ruling
>>CPC 124 "Drowned Baby" Conservatives
>>BQ 51 Quebec seperatistes (mildly left)
>>NDP 30 Socialists
>>Andre Arthur 1 Libertarian (not affiliated with the Libertarian Party)
>
>>. . . .
>
>I think that totals 309. From what I saw, NDP actually had 29.
>
Right.
And since a small number of seats are still in dispute, the
numbers may still change slightly. Normally that wouldn't matter
but if the NDP pick a couple of seats at the expense of the Bloc,
they become players again.
Given what wasn't sufficient to get a CPC majority (several
years of rolling scandals in the Liberal party, plus a sub-Dukakis
grade campaign), I have to wonder what exactly the Liberals would
have to do to give the CPC a chance at forming a government. Make
Ignatieff leader of the party?
--
http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/immigrate/
http://www.livejournal.com/users/james_nicoll
.
- References:
- This may actually be a first
- From: James Nicoll
- Re: This may actually be a first
- From: Daniel R . Reitman
- This may actually be a first
- Prev by Date: A Must-Have for All Readers ( :-) )
- Next by Date: Re: More hypothetical Jewish minutae
- Previous by thread: Re: This may actually be a first
- Next by thread: Re: This may actually be a first
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading