Re: Jerky teachers
- From: Daniel R. Reitman <dreitman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 17:11:33 -0800
On 23 Dec 2005 08:29:17 -0800, nomadicworld@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>I'm sure that was the result of years of frustration over students who
>didn't read the "In Judge Gesell's eyes".
No, the policy was to write new exams. In this case, he also came
into the exam in the middle and acknowledged that an obvious "not" had
been omitted from one question.
Dan, ad nauseam
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Jerky teachers
- From: nomadicworld
- Re: Jerky teachers
- References:
- Jerky teachers
- From: Lee Ratner
- Re: Jerky teachers
- From: Daniel R . Reitman
- Re: Jerky teachers
- From: Lee Ratner
- Re: Jerky teachers
- From: Daniel R . Reitman
- Re: Jerky teachers
- From: nomadicworld
- Jerky teachers
- Prev by Date: Farpoint 2006 convention
- Next by Date: Re: Embracing one's inner loser
- Previous by thread: Re: Jerky teachers
- Next by thread: Re: Jerky teachers
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|