Re: Alito In
- From: Lowell Gilbert <lgusenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 17 Nov 2005 17:49:13 -0500
sethb@xxxxxxxxx (Seth Breidbart) writes:
> In article <0badneJCadVoTObenZ2dnUVZ_vidnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
> Kip Williams <kiptw@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >Seth Breidbart wrote:
> >
> >> Is the memo itself available anywhere? I'm very disinclined to trust
> >> the sort of statement about it that I'm seeing; they seem to lean very
> >> heavily on someone's interpretation.
> >
> >I was just about to post that I couldn't find it -- that Googling on
> >phrases from it just get other iterations of those phrases. Then I
> >thought of The Smoking Gun, and darn if they don't have it:
> >
> >http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/1114052alito1.html
> >
> >The three pages are facsimiles, so they didn't show up in a search.
>
> And, as I suspected, they don't support the claims about them in the
> editorial.
>
> Eg: "I am particularly proud of my contributions in recent cases
> . . ." To me, that implies he thinks his contributions were well
> done, *not* that he necessarily agrees with the underlying position.
> But the editorial claims he said he supports the underlying position.
Given that it is, in context, clearly a set of examples of the
previous phrase, "help advance legal positions in which I personally
believe very strongly," I think you're working *very* hard to prove
that the straightforward reading of Alito's words is a liberal smear.
In fact, if your interpretation is the one that Alito intended, then I
think his lack of writing skill should disqualify him from the Supreme
Court.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Alito In
- From: David Friedman
- Re: Alito In
- References:
- Re: Alito In
- From: Kip Williams
- Re: Alito In
- From: Kip Williams
- Re: Alito In
- From: Seth Breidbart
- Re: Alito In
- From: Kip Williams
- Re: Alito In
- From: Seth Breidbart
- Re: Alito In
- Prev by Date: Re: Tuckerized at last!
- Next by Date: Re: Alito In
- Previous by thread: Re: Alito In
- Next by thread: Re: Alito In
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|