Re: Web hits, graphics vs non-graphics
- From: Charlton Wilbur <cwilbur@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 23:56:41 -0500
>>>>> "AW" == Alan Winston <winston@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
AW> Every webserver I have management experience with (OSU, WASD,
AW> and Apache, the last being the most popular Linux web server)
AW> log every request they get (which would include every
AW> "component"). The "page views" statistic you've seen is
AW> constructed by logfile analysis programs like Analog; it's not
AW> something the webserver logs per se.
AW> The <IMG> tag with a SRC parameter still generates a loggable
AW> HTTP request and a separate hit.
It *may*. It's entirely possible for a web server proxy somewhere to
cache images; "dialup accelerators" like Netzero do this, for
instance. So if you create a web page with one image, it's entirely
possible that someone using NetZero would issue a request for the page
and the image, but have the page come from your server and the image
come from a caching proxy. Further, if your page is static and your
web server sets appropriate HTTP headers, it's possible that someone
using NetZero or AOL could issue a request for your page and see
*both* of them answered from a caching proxy.
(I've spent quite a bit of effort over the past decade explaining to
people why hit counters are useless.)
Charlton
--
cwilbur at chromatico dot net
cwilbur at mac dot com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Web hits, graphics vs non-graphics
- From: Keith F. Lynch
- Re: Web hits, graphics vs non-graphics
- From: Alan Winston - SSRL Central Computing
- Re: Web hits, graphics vs non-graphics
- From: Bernard Peek
- Re: Web hits, graphics vs non-graphics
- References:
- Re: Web hits, graphics vs non-graphics (was: Conventions)
- From: Kevin J . Maroney
- Re: Web hits, graphics vs non-graphics (was: Conventions)
- From: Keith F. Lynch
- Re: Web hits, graphics vs non-graphics (was: Conventions)
- From: Danny Low
- Re: Web hits, graphics vs non-graphics (was: Conventions)
- From: Keith F. Lynch
- Re: Web hits, graphics vs non-graphics (was: Conventions)
- From: Danny Low
- Re: Web hits, graphics vs non-graphics (was: Conventions)
- From: Alan Braggins
- Re: Web hits, graphics vs non-graphics (was: Conventions)
- From: Danny Low
- Re: Web hits, graphics vs non-graphics (was: Conventions)
- From: Alan Winston - SSRL Central Computing
- Re: Web hits, graphics vs non-graphics (was: Conventions)
- Prev by Date: Re: New Harry Potter movie
- Next by Date: Re: New Harry Potter movie
- Previous by thread: Re: Web hits, graphics vs non-graphics (was: Conventions)
- Next by thread: Re: Web hits, graphics vs non-graphics
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|