Re: There is a Santa Claus!
- From: Brett Paul Dunbar <brett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 00:05:59 +0000
In message <dl5saq$7dj$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Keith F. Lynch <kfl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes
Doug Wickstrom <nimshubur@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:No, as I said, the _chart_ was prescient. It was also wrong about the numbers of moons of Jupiter, Saturn, Neptune, and Uranus.
What's the correct number? Are you sure? How do you know more moons around those planets won't be discovered next year? How large does something have to be to be a moon?
As those planets are now known to have more moons than the chart stated therefore the chart was definitely incorrect whatever the actual number. Jupiter has more than twelve moons Saturn more than nine. The current known totals for the outer planets are:
Jupiter Sixty-three Saturn Forty-six Uranus Twenty-seven Neptune Thirteen
For TNOs (in size order)
2003 UB313 "Xena" One Pluto Three 2005 FY9 "Easterbunny" Zero 2003 EL61 "Santa" One Sedna Zero Orcus Zero Quaoar Zero -- Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search http://www.mersenne.org/prime.htm Brett Paul Dunbar To email me, use reply-to address .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: There is a Santa Claus!
- From: Sea Wasp
- Re: There is a Santa Claus!
- References:
- There is a Santa Claus!
- From: Robert Sneddon
- Re: There is a Santa Claus!
- From: Sea Wasp
- Re: There is a Santa Claus!
- From: Doug Wickstrom
- Re: There is a Santa Claus!
- From: Keith F. Lynch
- There is a Santa Claus!
- Prev by Date: Re: Museum of Jurassic Technology
- Next by Date: Re: ^..^ Kali on Veterans' Day
- Previous by thread: Re: There is a Santa Claus!
- Next by thread: Re: There is a Santa Claus!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading