Re: Conventions
- From: sethb@xxxxxxxxx (Seth Breidbart)
- Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 19:27:04 +0000 (UTC)
In article <8d1im1pl4m9pjksr2400nr6bghp0p2vaqv@xxxxxxx>,
Brian Henderson <BrianL.Henderson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>On Wed, 2 Nov 2005 03:02:26 +0000 (UTC), sethb@xxxxxxxxx (Seth
>Breidbart) wrote:
>>In article <digfm1hnv8ei2f07k053nfooa37dn9h1sn@xxxxxxx>,
>>Brian Henderson <BrianL.Henderson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>Yes, but those people don't tell anyone they are a lawyer first, do
>>>they? There's a big difference between giving your opinion and
>>>identifying yourself as a lawyer, doctor or whatnot and THEN
>>>expressing your opinion based upon it.
>
>>There may be, but it isn't a _legal_ difference.
>
>That's where you're wrong, it's fraud. If you identify yourself as a
>doctor and then give people medical advice, it's illegal.
By which statute?
"Exercise more" is medical advice, right?
Seth
.
- References:
- Re: Conventions
- From: Brian Henderson
- Re: Conventions
- From: Brian Henderson
- Re: Conventions
- Prev by Date: Re: Conventions
- Next by Date: Re: OT: electric blankie time
- Previous by thread: Re: Conventions
- Next by thread: Re: Conventions
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
