Re: Slang attack
- From: Graham Woodland <gray@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 14:16:04 +0100
David Friedman wrote:
In article <48917e14_3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Graham Woodland <gray@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The Duke: "[annoying mystical riddling about enemy activity in the vicinity] ...Should I have known, should I have cared?"
"I should cocoa!" the Prince returned warmly. "[why they are in another deep brown substance] ...How'd you care to be caught between hammer and anvil?"
(Should you have known and cared? I should bloody say so!)
One further problem with this is that it is modern slang. To my ear, at least, if fantasy has a pre-modern setting, modern slang sounds wrong.
That particular dissonance is deliberate, and variations are endemic to the setting. The protagonist also has plot-significant trouble with conflicting cultural signals.
Modernity in the otherworld is... *different*.
--
Cheers,
Gray
---
To unmung address, lop off the 'be invalid' command.
.
- References:
- Slang attack
- From: Graham Woodland
- Re: Slang attack
- From: David Goldfarb
- Re: Slang attack
- From: David Goldfarb
- Re: Slang attack
- From: Brian M. Scott
- Re: Slang attack
- From: Helen Hall
- Re: Slang attack
- From: Graham Woodland
- Re: Slang attack
- From: David Friedman
- Slang attack
- Prev by Date: Re: Slang attack
- Next by Date: Re: Slang attack
- Previous by thread: Re: Slang attack
- Next by thread: Re: Slang attack
- Index(es):