Re: Latin in the future?
- From: "Brian M. Scott" <b.scott@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 23:32:26 -0400
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 14:00:51 +1200, Zeborah
<zeborah@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in
<news:1ik85xd.147iul29w0lzfN%zeborah@xxxxxxxxx> in
rec.arts.sf.composition:
Jonathan L Cunningham <spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[...]
I think I knew that. I thought Korean was most like
Japanese... (but not very like).
I'm pretty sure they're very unrelated languages, and the
main similarity between them is that they've each
borrowed a writing system and chunks of vocabulary from
Chinese.
There are some serious linguists who think that Japanese and
Korean are related, but I think that it's fair to say that
this is a minority view.
Brian
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Latin in the future?
- From: John W Kennedy
- Re: Latin in the future?
- References:
- Latin in the future?
- From: Peter Knutsen
- Re: Latin in the future?
- From: John W Kennedy
- Re: Latin in the future?
- From: CharlesRCaplan
- Re: Latin in the future?
- From: Brian M. Scott
- Re: Latin in the future?
- From: Peter Knutsen
- Re: Latin in the future?
- From: Zeborah
- Re: Latin in the future?
- From: CharlesRCaplan
- Re: Latin in the future?
- From: Peter Knutsen
- Re: Latin in the future?
- From: Dorothy J Heydt
- Re: Latin in the future?
- From: Peter Knutsen
- Re: Latin in the future?
- From: Jonathan L Cunningham
- Re: Latin in the future?
- From: Zeborah
- Re: Latin in the future?
- From: Jonathan L Cunningham
- Re: Latin in the future?
- From: Zeborah
- Latin in the future?
- Prev by Date: Re: Online novel
- Next by Date: Re: Online novel
- Previous by thread: Re: Latin in the future?
- Next by thread: Re: Latin in the future?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|