Re: Scalsi v Flint
- From: jdnicoll@xxxxxxxxx (James Nicoll)
- Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 13:22:00 +0000 (UTC)
In article <ddfr-D3CE92.02020331032008@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
David Friedman <ddfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
A while back I posted on my somewhat mixed response to an Eric Flint
novel. He successfully pushed my buttons, but to some degree it felt
manipulative.
I just read _Old Man's War_. Scalsi also succeeds in getting the desired
emotional reactions. But for some reason, perhaps superior subtlety, he
does it in a way that doesn't bother me. An impressive book.
For people who seach by author, that's Scalzi with a zed.
--
http://www.livejournal.com/users/james_nicoll
http://www.cafepress.com/jdnicoll (For all your "The problem with
defending the English language [...]" T-shirt, cup and tote-bag needs)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Scalsi v Flint
- From: Will in New Haven
- Re: Scalsi v Flint
- References:
- Scalsi v Flint
- From: David Friedman
- Scalsi v Flint
- Prev by Date: Re: Fishy question
- Next by Date: Re: Fishy question
- Previous by thread: Scalsi v Flint
- Next by thread: Re: Scalsi v Flint
- Index(es):