Re: hey
- From: Bill Swears <wswears@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2008 07:20:32 -0900
Jonathan L Cunningham wrote:
Dan Goodman <dsgood@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:I'm reasonably certain I've told this one here, but here goes, anyway. :-)
Jonathan L Cunningham wrote:
That's because you know they will fail. And instead of trying to doWhen NYC had a major blackout in the mid-1960s, it turned out that a
prevent it, you make plans for when that happens. So hospitals have
back-up generators that (are supposed to) cut in when it happens. Most
people won't die even if they are trapped in a lift (elevator) for a
few hours.
number of hospitals had emergency generators which depended on electric
fuel pumps.
That's why it's a good idea to test things. Oh, I suppose they did, and
it worked.
Maybe you need to test the testers too.
Jonathan
When I was on active duty in Kodiak, we installed a giant UPS under the Operations center flooring. If there was a major power failure, not only was our emergency generator to cut in, but it wasn't even going to cause a flicker in the Operations Center.
Once installed, the system needed a test, so on a bright and pretty day soon after, we very intentionally cut the power to the building. the generator came on, but then turned off. The power to everything controlled by the UPS failed immediately. We brought the building power back up. The rest of the building lit up, but everything powered through the UPS continued to be dark. We had active missions ongoing, but no way to talk to anybody, so threw command and control over to the District command center in Juneau, who were able to take control of the various distant radio antennas. It took several hours to convince the UPS to take itself offline so that we could resume normal operations. turned out that the UPS told the generator to cut off, because it didn't need a charge. Since the UPS was denying power to everything except the emergency generator's off switch, it would have been a very long time before the UPS needed a recharge.
Software malfunction, and the tech-rep we had on site for the test was completely out of his depth.
Bill
.
- Prev by Date: Handwavium
- Next by Date: Re: Obscure data of the past.
- Previous by thread: Re: hey
- Next by thread: Re: hey
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|