Re: Myth: Lumpers vs. Splitters
- From: djheydt@xxxxxxxxxxx (Dorothy J Heydt)
- Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 19:05:09 GMT
In article <47432a63$0$19235$804603d3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Dan Goodman <dsgood@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Carlos Ginzburg has said that "Oedipus" and "Cinderella" are basically
the same story. I can, just barely, see that -- if you regard a whole
lot of differences as trivial.
I don't know if Stephen Jay Gould originated the terms "lumpers" and
"splitters," but he's the writer whose work I encountered them in. A
lumper will study nine skeletons of similar unknown prehistoric animals
and assign them to two related species. A splitter will assign them to
seven new species.
Yeah. As Dr. Jane Robinson put it:
And when it comes to paleobotany,
You'll find that fossil plants are just a game:
You take the roots and seeds and shoots of one big tree
And give each one a separate family name.
Then you sweat and you strain over one damn pollen grain ...
which turns out to be a grain of dust.
We had that problem in the linguistics department too.
Dorothy J. Heydt
Albany, California
djheydt@xxxxxxxxxxx
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Myth: Lumpers vs. Splitters
- From: Del Cotter
- Re: Myth: Lumpers vs. Splitters
- References:
- Myth: Lumpers vs. Splitters
- From: Dan Goodman
- Myth: Lumpers vs. Splitters
- Prev by Date: Re: The Villain's Journey
- Next by Date: Re: Small sailing ship help
- Previous by thread: Re: Myth: Lumpers vs. Splitters
- Next by thread: Re: Myth: Lumpers vs. Splitters
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|