Re: Opening

On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 15:02:05 +0100, spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(Jonathan L Cunningham) wrote:

Marilee J. Layman <marilee@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Tue, 9 Oct 2007 13:01:18 +0100, spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Jonathan
L Cunningham) wrote:

But, odds of 14 million to one against are, for most people, outside the
realm of direct intuition. How does 14 million compare with the number
of stars in the sky? Grains of sand on a beach? I'm sure several people
here know the answers to both questions - but a lot of people won't. And
if you don't, how can you properly assess the value of a lottery ticket,
costing one pound? Is it like picking one star in the sky? Or one grain
of sand on the whole beach? How many grains in a bucket of sand?

The governor of Maryland is pushing slots. Some money will go to
education, but I bet not to education on how likely it is you'll lose
your money in the machines.

That's what we call fruit machines over here, isn't it?

The older ones tended to have fruit on them, and they're mentioned in
"Pretty Maggie Moneyeyes." I think the newer ones have other things,
but I don't remember what.

I never saw the appeal of them: the maximum amount that could be won was
never enough (and they are not something I'd go out of my way to locate
high vale prizes).

Apparently they're highly addictive to some folks. "Just one more
quarter!"

Back when they were electromechanical (and I was a postgrad), I knew a
guy who played them - he would also press on the plastic in front, to
try to stop the wheels spinning where he wanted. I think this improved
his odds of winning considerably - I saw him win "the jackpot" once,
probably around £70. But I don't think they improved his odds enough to
make a profit in the long run.

Oh, I think the jackpots here are in the thousands of dollars.

I've also heard of "quiz" machines where the time allowed to answer was
set too high (temporarily - the company rapidly realised the problem and
changed it) - thus allowing a team time to win semi-reliably. I don't
know if they are still popular; I tend not to notice machines designed
to eat money for no material benefit to me :-)

I don't think I've heard of those before.
--
Marilee J. Layman
http://mjlayman.livejournal.com
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: [OT] Stars versus sand grains
    ... >to the total number of stars in the universe. ... sources, of '100 billion galaxies, each averaging 10 billion stars'. ... you could get 50 typical grains ... of sand between the 1mm divisions on a ruler. ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: "Faster, More Powerful . 64 Bits!"
    ... > they need to buy an extra 128 petabyte memory stick to run the ... million stars shine down on us". ... Archimedes' estimate for the number of grains of sand ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: Opening
    ... of stars in the sky? ... Is it like picking one star in the sky? ... How many grains in a bucket of sand? ... That's what we call fruit machines over here, ...
    (rec.arts.sf.composition)
  • Re: Opening
    ... Grains of sand on a beach? ... Is it like picking one star in the sky? ... How many grains in a bucket of sand? ...
    (rec.arts.sf.composition)
  • [OT] Stars versus sand grains
    ... along a Dutch beach of fine sand. ... about the familiar comparison that there are more stars in the ... universe than the number of grains of sand on the Earth. ...
    (sci.electronics.design)