Re: Mass was Re: Questions (Space)



On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 00:43:04 -0500 in rec.arts.sf.composition, Ric Locke
<warlocke@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote,
Quibble: it's much easier to redefine "acceleration" as "add kinetic
energy", or (for short) "add energy".

Is an object in orbit undergoing constant acceleration?
Is it constantly having kinetic energy added to it?
I think acceleration means change in velocity, not change in KE.
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Mass was Re: Questions (Space)
    ... energy", ... Is an object in orbit undergoing constant acceleration? ... Of course it's always giving up kinetic energy at the same time, ...
    (rec.arts.sf.composition)
  • Re: The opposing rockets and the box
    ... having no kinetic energy left at all. ... or maybe gravity that did take it away to begin with. ... to prove the "conservation of the system". ...
    (sci.physics)
  • ORBITAL MOTION
    ... Every orbiting mass m has kinetic energy due ... total energy of the universe is a constant. ...
    (sci.edu)
  • Re: GRAVITY IS NOT A FORCE
    ... PLANETS ORBIT THE SUN TO CONSERVE TOTAL ENERGY ... THE FORCE OF GRAVITY IS AN ILLUSION ... The potential energy of the rest of the universe ... The kinetic energy of the universe must be ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: GRAVITY IS NOT A FORCE
    ... TO CONSERVE TOTAL ENERGY. ... THE FORCE OF GRAVITY IS AN ILLUSION ... The potential energy of the rest of the universe ... The kinetic energy of the universe must be ...
    (sci.physics)