Re: Mass was Re: Questions (Space)
- From: Ric Locke <warlocke@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 00:43:04 -0500
On Mon, 10 Sep 2007 23:33:57 +0100, Jonathan L Cunningham wrote:
However, if you take something like an electron going at 99% of the
speed of light, and apply a force, you can still accelerate it; just
not as much as you can when it's stationary. If you fudge Newton's
original equation, you can change it to X = K(v)*Y, where X is no
longer proportional to Y with K a constant of proportionality,
instead we make K a function of velocity, i.e. say that the mass is
a function of velocity.
Quibble: it's much easier to redefine "acceleration" as "add kinetic
energy", or (for short) "add energy". Accelerating a particle that's
already at .99c does in fact add energy to it -- it's just that (from an
outside observer's point of view) the energy goes into additional mass
instead of additional speed.
Quibble': from the POV of the particle being accelerated, Newton is
still correct. It's only that the rest of the Universe starts looking a
little funny.
Regards,
Ric
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Mass was Re: Questions (Space)
- From: David Harmon
- Re: Mass was Re: Questions (Space)
- References:
- Re: Questions (Space)
- From: Ric Locke
- Re: Questions (Space)
- From: Tina Hall
- Re: Questions (Space)
- From: Ric Locke
- Re: Questions (Space)
- From: Tina Hall
- Re: Questions (Space)
- From: David Friedman
- Re: Questions (Space)
- From: Tina Hall
- Re: Questions (Space)
- From: Sea Wasp
- Re: Questions (Space)
- From: Jonathan L Cunningham
- Re: Questions (Space)
- From: Tina Hall
- Re: Questions (Space)
- From: Jonathan L Cunningham
- Re: Questions (Space)
- From: Tina Hall
- Re: Questions (Space)
- From: Jonathan L Cunningham
- Re: Questions (Space)
- From: Tina Hall
- Re: Questions (Space)
- From: Jonathan L Cunningham
- Re: Questions (Space)
- From: Tina Hall
- Re: Questions (Space)
- From: Tim S
- Re: Questions (Space)
- From: Jonathan L Cunningham
- Re: Questions (Space)
- From: Tim S
- Mass was Re: Questions (Space)
- From: Jonathan L Cunningham
- Re: Questions (Space)
- Prev by Date: Re: Cause this isn't Star Wars...
- Next by Date: Re: Cause this isn't Star Wars...
- Previous by thread: Re: Mass was Re: Questions (Space)
- Next by thread: Re: Mass was Re: Questions (Space)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|