Re: Mass was Re: Questions (Space)



On Mon, 10 Sep 2007 23:33:57 +0100, Jonathan L Cunningham wrote:

However, if you take something like an electron going at 99% of the
speed of light, and apply a force, you can still accelerate it; just
not as much as you can when it's stationary. If you fudge Newton's
original equation, you can change it to X = K(v)*Y, where X is no
longer proportional to Y with K a constant of proportionality,
instead we make K a function of velocity, i.e. say that the mass is
a function of velocity.

Quibble: it's much easier to redefine "acceleration" as "add kinetic
energy", or (for short) "add energy". Accelerating a particle that's
already at .99c does in fact add energy to it -- it's just that (from an
outside observer's point of view) the energy goes into additional mass
instead of additional speed.

Quibble': from the POV of the particle being accelerated, Newton is
still correct. It's only that the rest of the Universe starts looking a
little funny.

Regards,
Ric

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Simple Clock Question.
    ... >>So accelerate the accelerator, then. ... Place a particle experiment ... energy is required to set up and maintain that field. ... The proton bangs into a neutron. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Force equals mass times acceleration
    ... it's about how much energy is required to accelerate an object ... > It takes twice as much energy for an object of twice the mass for the same ... > mass of the clubhead to transmit as much momentum to the ball as possible. ...
    (rec.sport.golf)
  • Re: Force equals mass times acceleration
    ... to achieve the greatest speed possible for the second object. ... It takes twice as much energy for an object of twice the mass for the same ... energy is sufficient to accelerate the first object of sufficient mass to ...
    (rec.sport.golf)
  • Re: Heres one for Bob (hope it makes your head spin)
    ... I fully understand that a particle accelerator would not be able to accelerate a particle to faster than speed of light. ... First, the energy that is transfered from the static item to the particle may not be able to travel faster than light, and second, there is the theory it will require an infinite amount of energy. ... the effective mass of the ship will increase so that giving the ship more energy will not significantly increase the speed up to or greater than the speed of light. ...
    (comp.os.vms)
  • Re: Who has the altimate article which debunks the "rotational mass" myth?
    ... compare the difference in masses between a few common wheel ... in mass is usually somewhat smaller. ... The energy in the rotating rim and tire is in transverse ... Energy to accelerate the mass difference from ...
    (rec.bicycles.tech)