Re: Harry Potter
- From: Crowfoot <pagemail@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 15:16:25 -0600
In article <A+W$Oxte20pGFwpT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Jacey Bedford <lookinsig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In message <46A73984.7020009@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sea Wasp
Catja Pafort wrote:
he's the *only* memorable and complex character in the wholeI'd disagree there. I thought Sirius was plenty interesting and
thundering parade, IMO.
which is why he had to die: I very much got the impression that Rowling
didn't have the skill to deal with him, so killing him was the easy way
And I've never forgiven her.
While I just found him a useful plot tool, but clearly there to
BE disposable and set up some Harry Angst, because she needed to kill
SOMEONE near him to make things believable (Voldemort not being a nice
gentle man) and didn't at that point want to be killing vital
characters like Hagrid, Dumbledore, Ron, and Hermione.
Semi plotspoiler question
Was it just me or was Hagrid mightily underused in the last book?
I think JKR got bored with him and his odd relationship
with the giants; which is a pity.\
- Prev by Date: Re: Harry Potter
- Next by Date: Re: Harry Potter
- Previous by thread: Re: Harry Potter
- Next by thread: Re: Harry Potter