Re: OT: Programming Careers
- From: David Mitchell <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 10:11:29 +0100
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 13:11:25 +0100, Jonathan L Cunningham wrote:
David Mitchell <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
A related problem is that, in prolog, you can define a "not" operator,
but "failure is treated as negation", i.e. the way prolog works, if it
can't prove something to be true, it treats it as if it were false.
That rings a bell.
IOW, Kowalski's slogan "program = logic + control" doesn't really apply
to prolog after all: prolog isn't logic. It's just another programming
language (a different and interesting one, to be sure).
"PRObably the Language Of God"
:-)
Never liked it much, myself.
--
=======================================================================
= David --- If you use Microsoft products, you will, inevitably, get
= Mitchell --- viruses, so please don't add me to your address book.
=======================================================================
.
- References:
- OT: Programming Careers
- From: David Mitchell
- Re: OT: Programming Careers
- From: Del Cotter
- Re: OT: Programming Careers
- From: Helen Hall
- Re: OT: Programming Careers
- From: Kevin J . Cheek
- Re: OT: Programming Careers
- From: Helen Hall
- Re: OT: Programming Careers
- From: Kai Henningsen
- Re: OT: Programming Careers
- From: David Mitchell
- Re: OT: Programming Careers
- From: Michael R N Dolbear
- Re: OT: Programming Careers
- From: Jonathan L Cunningham
- Re: OT: Programming Careers
- From: David Mitchell
- Re: OT: Programming Careers
- From: Jonathan L Cunningham
- OT: Programming Careers
- Prev by Date: Re: Zeno and the art of novel writing.
- Next by Date: Re: Do you speak Fashion?
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: Programming Careers
- Next by thread: Re: OT: Programming Careers
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|