Re: Help support non-crazy scientist?
- From: Ben Crowell <crowell07@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 15:03:22 -0700
Gruff wrote:
On Jun 12, 10:35 pm, Ben CrowellShifting to non-ironic mode, I think the negative information idea only
<crowel...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
One of the strangest
results (which I don't pretend to understand) is that it's possible
to have negative information. By receiving such information, you'd
know less than you had before you received it!
I can think of quite a few situations where I've ended up knowing less
after someone's told me something.
;o)
works if you're using a quantum computer (i.e., one that stores
information as qubits) to receive information that's transmitted
as a stream of qubits (e.g., via quantum entanglement). Since the
human brain isn't a quantum computer (uses bits, not qubits), I
think all humans on this newsgroup are automatically immune.
But hey, I think I feel a story idea coming out of this!
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Help support non-crazy scientist?
- From: Gruff
- Re: Help support non-crazy scientist?
- References:
- Help support non-crazy scientist?
- From: Steve
- Re: Help support non-crazy scientist?
- From: Ben Crowell
- Re: Help support non-crazy scientist?
- From: Gruff
- Help support non-crazy scientist?
- Prev by Date: Re: Speculative linguistics(*)
- Next by Date: Re: description and scene setting
- Previous by thread: Re: Help support non-crazy scientist?
- Next by thread: Re: Help support non-crazy scientist?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading