Re: Female characters
- From: Nicky <nicky.matthews@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 31 May 2007 09:56:15 -0700
On May 31, 1:01 pm, Peter Knutsen <p...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Nicky wrote:
On May 31, 7:32 am, Peter Knutsen <p...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
lclough wrote:
1). Describing a female character solely by her appearance. A bad
writer can focus this to a truly laser-like myopia; the classic example
is when a pair of large shapely breasts enter a room, incidentally
attached to a woman.
What if the character doing the describing has issues with breast size?
I thought all men had issues with breast size - different sizes,
different issues.
Who says the character doing the describing is male?
Well if she's female she would probably notice but may or may not
comment - if she had an issue
with breast size she probably would.
People notice waht interests them.
Nicky
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Female characters
- From: Dorothy J Heydt
- Re: Female characters
- References:
- Female characters
- From: Chris Kern
- Re: Female characters
- From: lclough
- Re: Female characters
- From: Peter Knutsen
- Re: Female characters
- From: Nicky
- Re: Female characters
- From: Peter Knutsen
- Female characters
- Prev by Date: Re: Female characters
- Next by Date: Re: Female characters
- Previous by thread: Re: Female characters
- Next by thread: Re: Female characters
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|