Re: Howlers
- From: Tim S <Tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 21:09:14 +0100
Jonathan L Cunningham wrote:
Tim S <Tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Jonathan L Cunningham wrote:
Conversely, you could do dimensional analysis treating mass and time asPeople do this all the time in GR. You set c and G to 1, and mass, length and time all come out in the same units. Just as in QFT, you set
the same (it would be a pretty daft thing to do, but you could). If you
did that, you couldn't distinguish momentum from length, but anything
you *can* distinguish (e.g. momentum and energy would still have
different dimensions) must certainly be different.
c and hbar to 1 and measure distance in reciprocal electron volts, etc.
Yebbut ... they don't think mass and time are the *same* -- they are
just normalising the units. Like a radius of curvature (of a curve at a
point) is not the same thing as the distance along the curve (at that
point) but it makes sense to measure them both in the same units, rather
than in furlongs and angstroms, even if it is a very short, very
straight, line. (I can imagine a curve 3 angstroms long with a radius
of curvature of 2.1 furlongs. Short and straight, it is.) And that's
much like our conventional measurements of mass, length and time.
I understand what you're saying, but I don't think it's quite as clear-cut as that. The decision as to what counts as "the same" and what counts as "different" isn't completely given to us from outside. This is more or less what you were saying a couple of posts back, except I'd go further than you in this.
Tim
.
- References:
- Re: Howlers
- From: Tony Williams
- Re: Howlers
- From: Brooks Moses
- Re: Howlers
- From: Jonathan L Cunningham
- Re: Howlers
- From: Andrew Stephenson
- Re: Howlers
- From: Jonathan L Cunningham
- Re: Howlers
- From: Andrew Stephenson
- Re: Howlers
- From: Jonathan L Cunningham
- Re: Howlers
- From: Andrew Stephenson
- Re: Howlers
- From: Jonathan L Cunningham
- Re: Howlers
- From: Andrew Stephenson
- Re: Howlers
- From: Jonathan L Cunningham
- Re: Howlers
- From: Andrew Stephenson
- Re: Howlers
- From: Tim S
- Re: Howlers
- From: Andrew Stephenson
- Re: Howlers
- From: Tim S
- Re: Howlers
- From: Jonathan L Cunningham
- Re: Howlers
- From: John W. Kennedy
- Re: Howlers
- From: Jonathan L Cunningham
- Re: Howlers
- From: Ric Locke
- Re: Howlers
- From: Jonathan L Cunningham
- Re: Howlers
- From: Tim S
- Re: Howlers
- From: Jonathan L Cunningham
- Re: Howlers
- Prev by Date: Re: Classifying fiction as science fiction - the Kiss of Death?
- Next by Date: Re: Classifying fiction as science fiction - the Kiss of Death?
- Previous by thread: Re: Howlers
- Next by thread: Re: Howlers
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|