Re: Upstairs--Third Person narration
- From: Gerry Quinn <gerryq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 12:50:28 -0000
In article <1olcbt7ef5hbn.1p0s1fdkngh68.dlg@xxxxxxxxxx>,
b.scott@xxxxxxxxxxx says...
On Sun, 18 Mar 2007 21:20:17 -0000, Gerry Quinn
<gerryq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
<news:MPG.2067bd709e56b2ba98b595@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> in
rec.arts.sf.composition:
Mathematics is just lists of strings obtained by the recursive
application of sets of string modification rules to an initial null
string.
No, it isn't. Take out 'just', and you'll have a statement
for which an argument can be made.
Given the context (reality, or physical reality if you prefer), it is
justified.
No, it isn't, though it's possible that you would have to
get inside a mathematician's mind to understand this.
If the mathematician wants to say something useful about physics (which
was the context), he had best adjust his concepts appropriately.
As I see it, we observe the universe and invent laws couched in
mathematical form, which seem to describe regularities in its
behaviour. At this point, we can write down a model description of
part of the universe as a string, and apply our mathematical apparatus
to generate further strings. Insofar as our model is valid, these new
strings will describe future or alternative states of the universe, or
the part of it we are interested in. But it is all predicated on the
model being and remaining valid to a good approximation. At no point
can we say the mathematics is 'in' the universe.
The question of 'what other sort is there' arises. Of
course Plato had an answer, but I'm more of an
Aristotelian.
I was not referring to Platonism, though it's true that most
mathematician's act and talk as if they were Platonists of
some sort. Mental constructs are part of our reality.
It's not obvious that they are part of physics. But I think this is
the point you were making when you said you would prefer the phrase
'physical reality'.
- Gerry Quinn
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Upstairs--Third Person narration
- From: James A . Donald
- Re: Upstairs--Third Person narration
- From: Brian M. Scott
- Re: Upstairs--Third Person narration
- References:
- Upstairs--Third Person narration
- From: v1313w
- Re: Upstairs--Third Person narration
- From: Jacey Bedford
- Re: Upstairs--Third Person narration
- From: v1313w
- Re: Upstairs--Third Person narration
- From: Jacey Bedford
- Re: Upstairs--Third Person narration
- From: Marilee J . Layman
- Re: Upstairs--Third Person narration
- From: Jacey Bedford
- Re: Upstairs--Third Person narration
- From: Marilee J . Layman
- Re: Upstairs--Third Person narration
- From: David Friedman
- Re: Upstairs--Third Person narration
- From: Ric Locke
- Re: Upstairs--Third Person narration
- From: Jonathan L Cunningham
- Re: Upstairs--Third Person narration
- From: Ric Locke
- Re: Upstairs--Third Person narration
- From: Jonathan L Cunningham
- Re: Upstairs--Third Person narration
- From: Gerry Quinn
- Re: Upstairs--Third Person narration
- From: Jonathan L Cunningham
- Re: Upstairs--Third Person narration
- From: Gerry Quinn
- Re: Upstairs--Third Person narration
- From: Brian M. Scott
- Re: Upstairs--Third Person narration
- From: Gerry Quinn
- Re: Upstairs--Third Person narration
- From: Brian M. Scott
- Upstairs--Third Person narration
- Prev by Date: Re: For those about to pub -- I salute you....
- Next by Date: Re: What kind of sets are there?
- Previous by thread: Re: Upstairs--Third Person narration
- Next by thread: Re: Upstairs--Third Person narration
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|