Re: Tech building
- From: Gerry Quinn <gerryq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 11:35:56 +0100
In article <1158250363.787705.275550@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
crumjd@xxxxxxxxx says...
I could be way out in left field here; I'm working without
references. But, as I recall, special relativity says that as you
approach the speed of light your mass increases (mass dilation) thus it
takes more energy to accelerate you. At light speed your mass, and the
energy required to accelerate you, are both infinite thus you can never
reach the speed of light. However, gravity accelerates all masses
equally so a gravitational accelerator shouldn't care how heavy you
get. I thought that's why black holes were postulated to exist in
the first place: their acceleration is so high that at some point
before you reach the surface you'd be going faster then light and
obviously nothing can return from beyond that point.
Usenet relativity FAQ:
< http://www2.corepower.com:8080/~relfaq/relativity.html >
...gives a good primer on special and general relativity.
Of course there are good reasons to doubt the plausibility of
Alcubierre warp drives etc. They tend to be based on ignoring
considerations from all physics other than general relativity. General
relativity conflicts with quantum mechanics, and the smart money is on
the latter winning the day - something's going to give in general
relativity, perhaps a lot more than its devoted students imagine.
But that's no reason to avoid them in SF, of course.
- Gerry Quinn
.
- References:
- Tech building
- From: Christina.Robertson
- Re: Tech building
- From: Joel Crum
- Re: Tech building
- From: Logan Kearsley
- Re: Tech building
- From: Joel Crum
- Tech building
- Prev by Date: Re: Men's Hour Books
- Next by Date: Re: Tech building
- Previous by thread: Re: Tech building
- Next by thread: Re: Tech building
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|