Re: Hmm - here's a topic to spark off a nice social commentary thread..

In article <MPG.1f2082aac53fb1f5989829@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Joann Zimmerman <jzimm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <d5WdnSzgQ4ayXCvZnZ2dnUVZ_uydnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
weyand@xxxxxxx says...
In article <1a0187778e5c036885508b7f5dd49042.8364@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Nicola Browne" <nicky.matthews@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

We are back to the old debate as to whether this constitutes a
conversation or a forum in which one is expected to defend oneself.

But David H. was being forced by you to defend himself.

What's this "force"? Avenging demons materializing out of David H's
monitor and taking bites?

Oh, come now. Nicky is complaining about "a forum in which one is expected to
defend oneself", because someone asked her and others who are attacking David
H. to substantiate their claims of what he said from the actual record.

I think expecting people to refer to the record when attacking someone is a
pretty modest request actually.

Rich Weyand
Working title "Message Received" complete
WIP: untitled sequel
.

Relevant Pages