Re: That semicolon again....
- From: Joann Zimmerman <jzimm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 13:18:47 -0500
In article <e91123$kok$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
mkkuhner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx says...
I am prone to write sentences like this:
"Lisette opened her hands, let him slump to the floor."
I know that the following is grammatically more correct:
"Lisette opened her hands and let him slump to the floor."
The original is a "comma splice." I think it's sometimes okay
to splice a comma, especially when the sentences are short like
these.
I am bothered, however, by the fact that both MS Word and a
copyeditor I've been dealing with correct this sentence to:
"Lisette opened her hands; let him slump to the floor."
Coming in late (news server decided to take a holiday this am), what's
wrong with "Lisette opened her hands, letting him slump to the floor." ?
Is that one okay at all? I would have said not, and just having
Word like it wouldn't have shaken my belief, but the copyeditor
said firmly that she wasn't following Word but made this
correction on her own.
There are probably several dozen such sentences in my WIR, so
I'm curious. Is my view of the semicolon too narrow?
It's the same as mine.
If the action of the first clause leads to the action of the second,
then changing the verb to a participle in the second is definitely in
order.
--
"I never understood people who don't have bookshelves."
--George Plimpton
Joann Zimmerman jzimm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: That semicolon again....
- From: David Friedman
- Re: That semicolon again....
- From: Mary K. Kuhner
- Re: That semicolon again....
- References:
- That semicolon again....
- From: Mary K. Kuhner
- That semicolon again....
- Prev by Date: Re: Hmm - here's a topic to spark off a nice social commentary thread..
- Next by Date: Re: Hmm - here's a topic to spark off a nice social commentary thread..
- Previous by thread: Re: That semicolon again....
- Next by thread: Re: That semicolon again....
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading