Re: Thomas Covenant series
- From: "Gruff" <gruffstar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 19 May 2006 01:45:22 -0700
Joy Beeson wrote:
On Thu, 11 May 2006 04:20:40 GMT, Sea Wasp
<seawaspobvious@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Strange. Calculus was EASIER than some of the math that came before
it for me. I ended DiffyQ with an average greater than 100%.
The first semester, differential calculus, was easy.
The second semester, integral calculus, was easy.
But I STILL don't understand how one is the inverse of the other.
And it was half a century ago, so I'd have to start over from scratch
if I tried to understand it now.
I realise I'm the only one still banging on about this, but it's been
nagging at me. It's important to me because I have at stake that
difficult ideas can be communicated (I'm sure I'm not alone). I
finally thought of a way of demonstrating that integration is the
inverse of differentation in a way that any writer would (so goes my
theory) find accessible, even ones that hate maths. Here we go:
So, you have a WIP which has a wordcount which (hopefully) grows over
time. You keep a track of the length of your WIP (perhaps in excel).
You find your daily writing _rate_ by differentiation: You take the
/difference/ between today's wordcount and yesterday's wordcount.
If you integrate what you have differentiated, i.e. add up all your
daily rates, you get back your original thing: your wordcount.
Thus integration is the inverse of differentiation.
Wordcount isn't a continuous function, but the process is conceptually
the same, and calculus just takes the limit of your interval (in this
case a 'day') down to zero.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Thomas Covenant series
- From: Jonathan L Cunningham
- Re: Thomas Covenant series
- References:
- Re: Thomas Covenant series
- From: David Friedman
- Re: Thomas Covenant series
- From: Chris Dollin
- Re: Thomas Covenant series
- From: David Friedman
- Re: Thomas Covenant series
- From: Helen Hall
- Re: Thomas Covenant series
- From: Darkhawk (H. Nicoll)
- Re: Thomas Covenant series
- From: Michelle Bottorff
- Re: Thomas Covenant series
- From: Alma Hromic Deckert
- Re: Thomas Covenant series
- From: Rich Weyand
- Re: Thomas Covenant series
- From: Alma Hromic Deckert
- Re: Thomas Covenant series
- From: Sea Wasp
- Re: Thomas Covenant series
- From: Joy Beeson
- Re: Thomas Covenant series
- Prev by Date: Re: naming moons
- Next by Date: Re: Thomas Covenant series
- Previous by thread: Re: Thomas Covenant series
- Next by thread: Re: Thomas Covenant series
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading