Re: Thomas Covenant series

Brian M. Scott wrote:
On Wed, 17 May 2006 02:04:58 GMT, Sea Wasp
<seawaspobvious@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
<news:446A84C9.7010509@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> in
rec.arts.sf.composition:

[...]

Because the nature of reality requires that it be there.

Sounds remarkably like one of the least convincing
traditional 'proofs' of the existence of God.

I was thinking something very similar.

Aqua
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Streets Ousting Of The Boy Scouts An Act Of Political Cowardice
    ... If "legally" God exists, is an American atheist boy obligated ... than it can legislate the Loch Ness Monster into existence. ... Bigot Brian, I am more concerned with the boys who I work with on the ...
    (rec.scouting.issues)
  • Re: Question about "the Gros Venure" as mentioned by Aubrey
    ... Brian M. Scott wrote: ... >> nyra wrote: ... >>> But if the result of a decision is already known to God ...
    (rec.arts.sf.composition)
  • Re: Is "is" a verb?
    ... Brian M. Scott wrote: ... > acknowledge its existence. ... Michael West ...
    (sci.lang)
  • Re: So Much for that God Story
    ... The Fremch philosopher Pascal argued that the existence of God can't ... to take what has been called Pascal's wager. ...
    (soc.retirement)
  • Re: OT: Post Birth Abortions
    ... for the existence of God. ... belief that God's existence can be demonstrated on theologically ... Those familiar with the history of apologetics of the past couple ... I want to answer two criticisms of presuppositionalism ...
    (rec.arts.marching.drumcorps)