Re: More slushpile sentences
- From: Helen Hall <mhall@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 09:44:50 +0000
In article <1x7nqdd59wor1.ape7z0li9y6t$.dlg@xxxxxxxxxx>, Brian M. Scott
<b.scott@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes
>On Mon, 9 Jan 2006 12:27:06 +0000, Helen Hall
><mhall@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
><news:MBC$1vAaalwDFwn8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> in
>
>> However, fortunately for Catja one of the replies was
>> right on the button. Chap called Rich, Rob? Something
>> like that.
>
>Rick Robinson.
Thanks. I was writing from memory and didn't have time to go back to the
crit which I'd read the day before.
>I completely agree with him about 'Ishtar'.
>The rest of his comments could be summed up as 'your
>synopsis tells us what happens but not what's going on',
>which does seem to me to be a fair criticism.
Yes, the reader needed to know why any of this mattered.
Helen
--
Helen, Gwynedd, Wales *** http://www.baradel.demon.co.uk
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: More slushpile sentences
- From: Patricia C. Wrede
- Re: More slushpile sentences
- References:
- More slushpile sentences
- From: Patricia C. Wrede
- Re: More slushpile sentences
- From: Catja Pafort
- Re: More slushpile sentences
- From: Anna Feruglio Dal Dan
- Re: More slushpile sentences
- From: Helen Hall
- Re: More slushpile sentences
- From: Brian M. Scott
- More slushpile sentences
- Prev by Date: Re: More slushpile sentences
- Next by Date: Re: The Spaniard's workshop Re: Introducing the city
- Previous by thread: Re: More slushpile sentences
- Next by thread: Re: More slushpile sentences
- Index(es):