Re: final editing pass
- From: "Brian M. Scott" <b.scott@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2006 19:02:05 -0500
On Mon, 02 Jan 2006 23:19:32 GMT, Sea Wasp
<seawaspobvious@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
<news:43B9B50B.6080509@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> in
rec.arts.sf.composition:
> nyra wrote:
[...]
>> Could someone fill me in on what the difference between [w] and [wh]
>> is? As someone who only writes and almost never speaks english, i can
>> only say that i wouldn't pronounce the two as homophones: because the
>> latter inevitably turns into 'vitsh'.
> Obviously a slight "h" sound after the "W". Exaggerated, it means
> you'd be saying W-here, W-hen, for where and when, etc.
You're being misled by the spelling: if that realization
occurs at all, it's very unusual. For some speakers it's a
slight [h] sound *before* the [w], and indeed <hw> is an
older spelling than <wh>. For others it's simply a
voiceless [w]. The only other realization that I can recall
having heard from a native speaker is [xw] (informally
\khw\), an exaggeration of [hw].
Brian
Brian
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: final editing pass
- From: Sea Wasp
- Re: final editing pass
- References:
- Re: final editing pass
- From: John W. Kennedy
- Re: final editing pass
- From: Brian M. Scott
- Re: final editing pass
- From: Bill Swears
- Re: final editing pass
- From: Brian M. Scott
- Re: final editing pass
- From: Bill Swears
- Re: final editing pass
- From: nyra
- Re: final editing pass
- From: Sea Wasp
- Re: final editing pass
- Prev by Date: Re: Beautiful woman want to be your wife
- Next by Date: BSP - "Party Dress"
- Previous by thread: Re: final editing pass
- Next by thread: Re: final editing pass
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading