Re: Effect of discovering alien sentience
- From: "Brian M. Scott" <b.scott@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2005 14:20:48 -0500
On Sun, 20 Nov 2005 13:44:25 -0500, "Kevin J. Cheek"
<kevinc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
<news:MPG.1dea4959ea9a9fe989a25@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> in
rec.arts.sf.composition:
> In article <Iq8LwH.EFs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, whheydt@xxxxxxxxxxx says...
>> I can see ID coming up in such a discussion very easily.
>> What I can't see is such a discussion winding up
>> supporting ID if the participants know very much.
> Odd thing is I recall some very good arguments to that
> effect by people who were very knowledgeable.
Rather, by people who impressed you as being very
knowledgeable. I have yet to see any evidence that support
of ID á la Behe and Dembski -- and that is what is normally
meant by the term -- isn't pretty much a guarantee that the
supporter either is not really knowledgeable or has
non-scientific reasons for his support.
Brian
.
- References:
- Effect of discovering alien sentience
- From: Denni
- Re: Effect of discovering alien sentience
- From: Kevin J . Cheek
- Re: Effect of discovering alien sentience
- From: Wilson Heydt
- Re: Effect of discovering alien sentience
- From: Kevin J . Cheek
- Re: Effect of discovering alien sentience
- From: Wilson Heydt
- Re: Effect of discovering alien sentience
- From: Kevin J . Cheek
- Effect of discovering alien sentience
- Prev by Date: Re: Effect of discovering alien sentience
- Next by Date: Re: How do... YOU... do... "IT"?
- Previous by thread: Re: Effect of discovering alien sentience
- Next by thread: Re: Effect of discovering alien sentience
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|