Re: VERY OT - Calling all domestic goddesses or gods actually.
- From: Bill Swears <wswears@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 22:48:51 -0900
David Friedman wrote:
Not really a bad idea. buy three more ink cartridges, bring in a friend, and, while wearing the original pair of sinning high heals, dance the night away. You'll end up with a reasonably uniform random pattern on your carpet, and people will think it's intentional.In article <dkus52$tg8$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Julian Flood" <jf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Nicola Browne" wrote
Help! Anyone know what to do?
Move?
JF Seriously, I'd bet it's a gonner. Cut and paste.
Invent a new aesthetic theory, which holds as its ideal a blend of design and accident.
Bill
-- Bill Swears
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
Ben Franklin, 1755 "Historical Review of Pennsylvania"
To think that was once a right wing comment. In the land of Homeland Security it seems.. Suspiciously left-wing.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: VERY OT - Calling all domestic goddesses or gods actually.
- From: Nicola Browne
- Re: VERY OT - Calling all domestic goddesses or gods actually.
- References:
- Re: VERY OT - Calling all domestic goddesses or gods actually.
- From: Julian Flood
- Re: VERY OT - Calling all domestic goddesses or gods actually.
- From: David Friedman
- Re: VERY OT - Calling all domestic goddesses or gods actually.
- Prev by Date: Re: VERY OT - Calling all domestic goddesses or gods actually.
- Next by Date: Re: What's taters?
- Previous by thread: Re: VERY OT - Calling all domestic goddesses or gods actually.
- Next by thread: Re: VERY OT - Calling all domestic goddesses or gods actually.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
