Re: Hospitable? Re: population sizes for colonising a planet
- From: phoenix@xxxxxxx (Damien Sullivan)
- Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 02:26:56 +0000 (UTC)
"David Tomlin" <davtomcat@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Would Venus be the system's second best source of uranium and other
>> minerals preferentially differentiated into Earth's crust?
>
>I think the best source for all heavy metals would be
>metallic asteroids, some of which are earth-crossing.
Contra various posts that Earth may be the best souce of uranium. Asteroids
would have some but scattered randomly, free of gravitational or biological
concentrations.
-xx- Damien X-)
.
- References:
- population sizes for colonising a planet
- From: senn
- Re: Hospitable? Re: population sizes for colonising a planet
- From: Mark Atwood
- Re: Hospitable? Re: population sizes for colonising a planet
- From: David Tomlin
- population sizes for colonising a planet
- Prev by Date: Re: Hospitable? Re: population sizes for colonising a planet
- Next by Date: Re: population sizes for colonising a planet
- Previous by thread: Re: Hospitable? Re: population sizes for colonising a planet
- Next by thread: Re: Hospitable? Re: population sizes for colonising a planet
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|