Re: Dorothy? We're definitely in Kansas, dear.
- From: Lucy Kemnitzer <ritaxis@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 02:01:21 -0700
On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 21:04:10 -0400, "Brian M. Scott"
<b.scott@xxxxxxxxxxx> seems to have said:
>On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 20:33:31 -0400, "Marilee J. Layman"
><mjlayman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in
><news:fgmll197jl4ijj89oe5cmahp8f28fm709g@xxxxxxx> in
>rec.arts.sf.composition:
>
>[...]
>
>> One of my neighbor's dogs has four legs but only uses three. I have
>> to say it can still pull him along like crazy when they go on walks.
>
>A good many years ago the woman who owns my favorite bike
>shop rescued a Siberian husky that had lost a leg to a car
>but was still wonderfully agile going up and down stairs.
>Lovely animal. It died quite a while back; eventually she
>adopted two more, Ginger and Bear -- also lovely animals,
>and they have all their legs, but they're getting a bit old
>now, I'm afraid.
>
Three legged dogs seem to generally do very well -- there are a
couple-few who come to the dog park now and then.
Lucy Kemnitzer, still
chapter 14 is up:
http://www.baymoon.com/~ritaxis/donor/donorweb/donorindex
also, see Frank's hurricane relief mail:
http://www.livejournal.com/users/franksmail/
.
- References:
- Re: Dorothy? We're definitely in Kansas, dear.
- From: Jonathan L Cunningham
- Re: Dorothy? We're definitely in Kansas, dear.
- From: Gerry Quinn
- Re: Dorothy? We're definitely in Kansas, dear.
- From: Gerry Quinn
- Re: Dorothy? We're definitely in Kansas, dear.
- From: Brian M. Scott
- Re: Dorothy? We're definitely in Kansas, dear.
- From: Brian M. Scott
- Re: Dorothy? We're definitely in Kansas, dear.
- From: Marilee J . Layman
- Re: Dorothy? We're definitely in Kansas, dear.
- Prev by Date: Re: population sizes for colonising a planet
- Next by Date: Re: 'Topic Sentences' (Was: descriptive/external exercises)
- Previous by thread: Re: Dorothy? We're definitely in Kansas, dear.
- Next by thread: Re: Dorothy? We're definitely in Kansas, dear.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading