Re: population sizes for colonising a planet

jdnicoll@xxxxxxxxx (James Nicoll) wrote:
>In article <4350C42C.F23291F4@xxxxxxx>, nyra <nyra@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>[1] my rough-guess figures - hopefully about correct to an order of
>>magnitude or two - are that 2 m² of Earth area receive the amount of
>>energy from the Sun that one human consumes.
>
> Rather surprisingly (Or at least _I_ was surprised when I realized
>this), human body produce about 100 watts and on average each square meter
>of the Earth gets about 350 watts, at least at the top of the atmosphere.
>So call it 1/3rd of a meter. 1% efficiency (which is even worse than photo-
>synthesis) would make that 30 square meters.
>
> There's a lot of room for improvement in the systems we use to
>turn daylight into thinking meat.

I think the efficiency is limited by the difficulty of extracting CO2 from its
microscopic atmospheric concentration. It may be why plants have leaves
rather than being giant flat sheets, and are more energy-efficient in dim and
diffuse light.

Solar panels look much more efficient at making electricity but if you then
had to turn that power into hydrocarbon fuel using CO2 and H2O as inputs I
have no idea if you could easily beat plants at their game.

-xx- Damien X-)
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Angelfish off MASS and bleaching coral....(link to global warming series)
    ... system by the doubling of atmospheric CO2 is about four watts per square meter --a very small amount of energy when compared to the 342 watts per square meter ... This same article goes on to babble about the uncertainty of effects of cloud cover and atmospheric movement, which is basically admitting they have no idea what the effect of that claimed 1% increase in energy would be. ...
    (rec.boats)
  • Re: population sizes for colonising a planet
    ... >energy from the Sun that one human consumes. ... human body produce about 100 watts and on average each square meter ... of the Earth gets about 350 watts, at least at the top of the atmosphere. ...
    (rec.arts.sf.composition)
  • Re: can the moon damage eyesight?
    ... light per unit area is higher, it's that the area is much greater so ... If light *energy per square meter* is 200 W ... input in this point is also 2 Watts. ...
    (uk.sci.astronomy)
  • Re: can the moon damage eyesight?
    ... If you use a convex lens with an area 1/100 of a square meter and focus ... input in this point is also 2 Watts. ... But energy per square meter in this very point is then ...
    (uk.sci.astronomy)
  • Re: Is it this easy to live on Mars?
    ... haha - the amount of energy ... on Mars with a 0.6 kpa air pressure. ... That's 165 watts per person. ... nitrogen and water are not going to be a problem for Mars explorers. ...
    (sci.space.policy)