Re: A newcomer here
- From: "Logan Kearsley" <chrono.surfer@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 02:03:27 GMT
"David Friedman" <ddfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ddfr-DAA931.18240812092005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> In article <GepVe.3508$XO6.2586@trnddc03>,
> "Logan Kearsley" <chrono.surfer@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > With constant crust thickness and density, the surface gravity
> > increases as the radius increases.
>
> No. It stays constant.
>
> Area goes as the square of radius, so with constant thickness and
> density mass goes as the square of radius.
Except that it doesn't, exactly. It's somewhat off. Assuming constant
density, the mass is dependent on the volume of the shell, which is the
volume of the spherical world minus the volume of the empty spherical
interior. This will only scale with the surface area / square of the radius
if the ratio between the outer sphere and the inner sphere is constant, but
if the shell thickness is constant, that ratio won't be.
> Surface gravity goes as mass
> over radius squared.
-l.
------------------------------------
My inbox is a sacred shrine, none shall enter that are not worthy.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A newcomer here
- From: David Friedman
- Re: A newcomer here
- From: Brian M. Scott
- Re: A newcomer here
- From: Logan Kearsley
- Re: A newcomer here
- References:
- A newcomer here
- From: savegraduation
- Re: A newcomer here
- From: Wilson Heydt
- Re: A newcomer here
- From: Zeborah
- Re: A newcomer here
- From: Michelle Bottorff
- Re: A newcomer here
- From: Wilson Heydt
- Re: A newcomer here
- From: Brooks Moses
- Re: A newcomer here
- From: James A . Donald
- Re: A newcomer here
- From: Logan Kearsley
- Re: A newcomer here
- From: David Friedman
- A newcomer here
- Prev by Date: Re: More gun questions Re: gun terminology
- Next by Date: Re: Crit: Opening of "My Day in Elfland"
- Previous by thread: Re: A newcomer here
- Next by thread: Re: A newcomer here
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|