Re: A newcomer here
- From: "Brian M. Scott" <b.scott@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 23:03:07 -0400
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 02:03:27 GMT, Logan Kearsley
<chrono.surfer@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
<PrqVe.6937$b37.3139@trnddc04">news:PrqVe.6937$b37.3139@trnddc04> in
rec.arts.sf.composition:
> "David Friedman" <ddfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:ddfr-DAA931.18240812092005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> In article <GepVe.3508$XO6.2586@trnddc03>,
>> "Logan Kearsley" <chrono.surfer@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> With constant crust thickness and density, the surface gravity
>>> increases as the radius increases.
>> No. It stays constant.
>> Area goes as the square of radius, so with constant thickness and
>> density mass goes as the square of radius.
> Except that it doesn't, exactly. It's somewhat off. Assuming constant
> density, the mass is dependent on the volume of the shell, which is the
> volume of the spherical world minus the volume of the empty spherical
> interior. This will only scale with the surface area / square of the radius
> if the ratio between the outer sphere and the inner sphere is constant, but
> if the shell thickness is constant, that ratio won't be.
Let inner radius = r, outer radius = r + t. Then volume =
(4/3)*pi*[(r + t)^3 - r^3] = (4/3)*pi*(3tr^2 + 3rt^2 + t^3),
i.e., mass is proportional to 3tr^2 + 3rt^2 + t^3, and force
is proportional to 3t + 3t^2 / r + t^3 / r^2, which for
constant t decreases as r increases.
Alternatively, let the inner radius be r, the outer radius
kr. The volume is proportional to (k^3 - 1)r^3, the force
to (k^3 - 1)r = (1 + k + k^2)(k - 1)r = (1 + k + k^2)t,
since t = (k - 1)r. Thus, the force is proportional to
1 + k + k^2. But if t is fixed, k = 1 + t/r is decreasing
as r increases, so the force is decreasing.
Brian
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A newcomer here
- From: Jonathan L Cunningham
- Re: A newcomer here
- References:
- A newcomer here
- From: savegraduation
- Re: A newcomer here
- From: Wilson Heydt
- Re: A newcomer here
- From: Zeborah
- Re: A newcomer here
- From: Michelle Bottorff
- Re: A newcomer here
- From: Wilson Heydt
- Re: A newcomer here
- From: Brooks Moses
- Re: A newcomer here
- From: James A . Donald
- Re: A newcomer here
- From: Logan Kearsley
- Re: A newcomer here
- From: David Friedman
- Re: A newcomer here
- From: Logan Kearsley
- A newcomer here
- Prev by Date: Re: A short scene, and its content
- Next by Date: Re: A newcomer here
- Previous by thread: Re: A newcomer here
- Next by thread: Re: A newcomer here
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|