Re: A newcomer here
- From: John F. Eldredge <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 17:28:47 -0500
On Sun, 11 Sep 2005 14:29:34 -0700, Brooks Moses
<bmoses-nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Wilson Heydt wrote:
>> In article <1h2iifw.1fahmba1nptncwN%mbottorff@xxxxxxx>,
>> Michelle Bottorff <mbottorff@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>If we were talking science fiction, I rather thought we couldn't get a
>>>sun small enough that it had less mass than an "earthlike" planet.
>>>
>>>If anyone has a notion of how to get one, though, I'd love to hear about
>>>it. I could *do* stuff with that.
>>
>> Small enough diameter is easy enough. Use a white dwarf. Mass is
>> another issue altoghter, plus explaining how you have a habitable
>> planet orbiting a reasonable distance from the white dwarf, 'cause
>> it sure isn't going to be that way while the star gets that way.
>
>Well, it's possible to have a planet with earth-levels of gravity and
>arbitrarily high mass, so long as one doesn't mind having a hollow
>planet. (And, at some point way up in the "arbitrarily high" scale, the
>planet's crust starts becoming remarkably thin....)
>
>So, you could have this tremendous beach-ball of a planet, carefully
>constructed near a white dwarf, with the white dwarf orbiting around it
>in a manner very reminiscent of the sun-god's chariot driving by
>overhead. If the orbital distance is small enough relative to the
>diameter of the planet, you then get only a small swath of land under
>the sun's path that actually gets much sunlight, and the nights are much
>longer than the days. And there's this tremendous realm of dark cold
>land (or maybe ocean) outside the lit areas, which may or may not harbor
>monsters.
>
>Making a hollow beach-ball planet strong enough to avoid self-collapse
>and to avoid breaking apart with the tidal forces is, of course, an
>interesting exercise.
If the planet has greater-than-Earth mass, it will have
greater-than-Earth gravity. Hollowing out the interior of a planet
(while presumably using some sort of handwavium force field to keep it
from collapsing inward under its own weight) will result in less
gravity, not greater gravity.
I think that what you are probably intending is to have a hollow
planet of considerably-greater-than-Earth diameter, while using the
hollow interior as a way of keeping the mass down so that the surface
gravity will be similiar to that of Earth.
Have you read Tony Rothman's _The World is Round_, which uses such a
scheme (although with a normal star, not a white dwarf)?
--
John F. Eldredge -- john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
PGP key available from http://pgp.mit.edu
"Reserve your right to think, for even to think wrongly is better
than not to think at all." -- Hypatia of Alexandria
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A newcomer here
- From: David Friedman
- Re: A newcomer here
- References:
- A newcomer here
- From: savegraduation
- Re: A newcomer here
- From: Wilson Heydt
- Re: A newcomer here
- From: Zeborah
- Re: A newcomer here
- From: Michelle Bottorff
- Re: A newcomer here
- From: Wilson Heydt
- Re: A newcomer here
- From: Brooks Moses
- A newcomer here
- Prev by Date: Re: A newcomer here
- Next by Date: Re: No Exit & Sartre
- Previous by thread: Re: A newcomer here
- Next by thread: Re: A newcomer here
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|