Re: More gun questions Re: gun terminology
- From: Bill Swears <wswears@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 13:24:41 -0800
James A. Donald wrote:
-- Stephen Horgan
If a weapon designed for air and earth normal pressure and temperature is used outside of those environmental ranges then there may be dangers.
There is no danger in using a gun in vacuum, nor in air that is considerably thicker than normal, though of course, you lose range in proportion to how thick the air is.
Have you fired a gun in vacuum? Do you know anybody who has?
A lot of close tolerance metals stick together in vacuum. Hence the possibility you might get the gun acting differently from the design. Nobody was suggesting a greater propensity toward shock wave issues.
Although, firing from the hip as your space suited soldier EVA's toward the enemy might carry panalties in the third law arena...
Bill .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: More gun questions Re: gun terminology
- From: James A . Donald
- Re: More gun questions Re: gun terminology
- References:
- gun terminology
- From: James A . Donald
- Re: gun terminology
- From: Ben Crowell
- More gun questions Re: gun terminology
- From: Dan Goodman
- Re: More gun questions Re: gun terminology
- From: James A . Donald
- Re: More gun questions Re: gun terminology
- From: Stephen Horgan
- Re: More gun questions Re: gun terminology
- From: James A . Donald
- Re: More gun questions Re: gun terminology
- From: Stephen Horgan
- Re: More gun questions Re: gun terminology
- From: James A . Donald
- gun terminology
- Prev by Date: Re: Pearl Harbor question
- Next by Date: Re: Continental vs British toilets
- Previous by thread: Re: More gun questions Re: gun terminology
- Next by thread: Re: More gun questions Re: gun terminology
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|