Re: Representing futuristic English
- From: James A. Donald <jamesd@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 21:27:48 -0700
--
On Wed, 31 Aug 2005 09:15:45 +1200, zeborah@xxxxxxxxx
(Zeborah) wrote:
> The archaeologists in the scenario here *don't know
> that it's text*. They're looking at a CD, and have no
> idea what's on it. It could be pictures, or sound, or
> video, or olfactio, or a computer application compiled
> into assembly language. It could be a mixture of all
> the above; and all the above could be stored in
> multiple file formats. Which the archaeologists can
> start analysing once they've decided how the data is
> segmented on the CD.
There is going to be *some* text on the CD, and it will
be obvious it is text. That will give them a place to
start.
--digsig
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
gzpVxwoO3vPpd5lVLHj9mLgA9SXWwR6BJBcvEsVr
4199ALLg9xfLyk4pmyHLfUg6aQDMKJyxbIvcypHjr
--
http://www.jim.com
.
- References:
- Re: Representing futuristic English
- From: Kristopher
- Re: Representing futuristic English
- From: Constantinople
- Re: Representing futuristic English
- From: Wilson Heydt
- Re: Representing futuristic English
- From: Constantinople
- Re: Representing futuristic English
- From: Wilson Heydt
- Re: Representing futuristic English
- From: James A . Donald
- Re: Representing futuristic English
- From: Wilson Heydt
- Re: Representing futuristic English
- From: James A . Donald
- Re: Representing futuristic English
- From: Wilson Heydt
- Re: Representing futuristic English
- From: Gerry Quinn
- Re: Representing futuristic English
- From: Wilson Heydt
- Re: Representing futuristic English
- From: Richard D. Latham
- Re: Representing futuristic English
- From: Zeborah
- Re: Representing futuristic English
- Prev by Date: Re: Morality Question
- Next by Date: Re: Representing futuristic English
- Previous by thread: Re: Representing futuristic English
- Next by thread: Re: Representing futuristic English
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|