Re: Help Constructing Fictional Cross-Religious Movement



On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 14:53:58 -0400, "Brian M. Scott"
<b.scott@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 17:37:17 GMT, Jonathan L Cunningham
><spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in

>[...]
>
>> Linguists separate out at least six different kinds of
>> "meaning" for words.
>
>That sounds more like philosophy than linguistics; what
>sorts of things do you have in mind?

The philosophy might be whether you accept the theory,
as a piece of linguistics, but it was presented "straight"
as "fact" in the same way that "there are five phyla" is
a fact: i.e. you can argue that there are seven phyla, not
five, but this is not usually considered to be philosophy.

I'd have to go and consult a textbook[*] for the complete
list (of six). And it might be more precise to use
"utterance" instead of "word", although I expect it would
be possible to contrive examples at the word level

Three of them are: denotational, connotational and pragmatic.

To illustrate just those three:
"Have you got a light?"
"Do you know what time it is?"
"Could you pass the salt?"
illustrate clearly the difference between denotational and
pragmatic meanings. For a married couple who first met
because she asked him "Have you got a light?" the connotational
meaning would be *very* different than for most people.

Obviously the other three seem less significant to me (or
I'd remember them better) - I'll now need to locate a list
of them for my own peace of mind. I think one of them is
particularly relevant to understanding poetry[**]: it has
something to do with tone or emotion (in a way which is
different from connotational) but that may be me
misremembering: I really need to go and look it up.

I can't remember whether something like sarcasm depended
on one of the types I can't recall, or whether that kind
of thing comes under pragmatism. It's not really a matter
of pragmatics if you insult someone with "you are *so*
clever".

[Interesting: I hadn't realised how much I'd forgotten. I
suspect, if I go and look it up, nowadays I'd come up with
my own list of aspects of meaning, which might be shorter.
Or possibly longer.]

>From a writing POV, the denotational/pragmatic distinction
is most significant (for writing humorous aliens and/or
silly robots). The too-literal bozo is a stock character
in some other kinds of fiction too.

For a robot, the distinction is between "do what I say"
and "do what I mean". So, in some sense, the pragmatic
meaning is primary, but intuitively, we tend to think of
the denotational meaning as the "real" one.

Jonathan

[*] Or ask one of my friends.
[**} That's one of the factoids floating around my
memory and was my own conclusion, not something that was in
my original source.

--
Backlog in rasfc: 600
Mail to spam auto-deleted, use jlc1 instead.
(That's jay ell cee one, if your font makes l and 1 look the same)

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Clueless question about meaning
    ... more generally, the line, if any, between linguistics, and linguistic ... philosophy, and the analytic tradition of philosophy of language. ... mind asks about the meaning of ascriptions of mental states, ...
    (sci.lang)
  • Re: aestimare
    ... Showing that you don't post anything relevant to linguistics. ... for words aren't so narrow in their meaning as ... of the tongue, a sound that may also be called lip lick), ... Early language was not entirely made of clicks, ...
    (sci.lang)
  • Re: Why choose a paragraph element for a paragraph?
    ... This is a technical term meaning it is a phrase that acts rather ... that I used in describing the distinction between sense and reference. ... true in people's minds. ... philosophy as some sort of muddle clearing house. ...
    (alt.html)
  • Re: 3 Keystones for OO Simulationist Design (Re: Real world modeling.
    ... In recent times Empiricism and Pragmatism emerged as the primary guiding ... philosophy of respectively the British and American owning classes. ... Leading exponents of British Empiricism have been George Berkeley, John ...
    (comp.object)
  • Re: Turing Machines and Physical Computation
    ... Is the meaning an attribute of the symbol, or of the user of the ... between numerals and numbers. ... The subject does not need to be a property of the mark. ... >>that only reflects on the inadequacies of philosophy. ...
    (comp.theory)