Re: commenting v. reading and then commenting
- From: Beau Blue <Beau_Blue@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 10:46:24 -0800
ggamble <ff@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>On 29 Jan 2006 04:17:09 -0800, "wlod" <guru_ji@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> And anyway,
>>when you don't do your reader's duty, then your
>>suggestions of "improvements" are bound to be silly,
>
>
>Are you saying that PJ Ross' comments on your Achilles poem were
>*silly*?
Are you s t r e t c h i n g for a fight, Gus? Bored with Bill?
>
>I've seen a lot of *silly* commentary on poems.
haven't we all ..
>What PJ wrote about your poem could have been useful to you if you
>were interested in producing your best work.
"could have been useful"? Are you saying people only get one bite
at an apple? One glance at their hole cards? What a toughie you are,
Gus. Off-the-top-of-the-head comments are bound to be silly, you know?
>
>If you're just interested in sharing, then, ignore the good advice you
>got and apologize to PJ for wasting his time.
Another demand for another meaningless apology? It's Peter's time
to do with as Peter pleases, Gus. Wlod's got nothing to do with it.
But, if Peter is being horribly, horribly injured by the time he's
spending hip-shooting I'm sure we can find at least a half-dozen
hanky snifling, ladies-in-waiting to stroke his fuzzy facial hair and
lament over his self-inflicted wounds. Maybe not tho' .. but I bet
Jim could probably arrange it, now that he's back.
"Quick, find a nurse! Peej has stabbed himself in the eye again.
But first, find Gus, we need a call for someone to apologize."
"This is always so much fun to watch."
>
>Or not.
Or not ... except for when Mercury is in 'retrograde'?
But that's not 'til March, right?
-blue
>
>
~ Beau Blue Presents ~ <> http://members.cruzio.com/~jjwebb
Bill Minor * Robert Sward <> Internet Broadsides
Michael McNeilley <> Contemporary American Poetry
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: commenting v. reading and then commenting
- From: Dennis M. Hammes
- Re: commenting v. reading and then commenting
- From: ggamble
- Re: commenting v. reading and then commenting
- From: kiwi K Ross
- Re: commenting v. reading and then commenting
- References:
- commenting v. reading and then commenting
- From: wlod
- Re: commenting v. reading and then commenting
- From: Rob Evans
- Re: commenting v. reading and then commenting
- From: wlod
- Re: commenting v. reading and then commenting
- From: ggamble
- commenting v. reading and then commenting
- Prev by Date: Re: commenting v. reading and then commenting
- Next by Date: Re: commenting v. reading and then commenting
- Previous by thread: Re: commenting v. reading and then commenting
- Next by thread: Re: commenting v. reading and then commenting
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|